Toulouse


Clermont
J. Marchand (7'), T. Thomas (11'), S. Daroque (25')
Tries
B. Jauneau (34'), T. Frier (78')
V. Delpy (12', 26')
Conversions
H. Plummer (34')
V. Delpy (50', 65', 70')
Penalties
H. Plummer (40+1', 52')
This told us more about ruthlessness than romance. Toulouse didn’t flood the game with chances, they simply finished the ones that mattered and managed the scoreboard when it tightened. In contrast, Clermont produced plenty of traffic but lacked the teeth to turn time in the 22 into points. The difference lived in the red zone and in how the hosts handled the middle of the second half.
On almost identical territory, the outputs were miles apart: Toulouse squeezed 3.1 points per visit from eight entries; Clermont limped to 1.3 from nine. That gap matches what the eye said — the leaders were comfortable for 76 minutes of lead time because every foray carried consequence, while Clermont’s long spells of phase play rarely bent the gain line when it counted. Even when the visitors owned 79% of the ball late, they only prised one try. Volume without incision.
Match Stats
CARRIES
CLEAN BREAK
DEFENDER BEATEN
TACKLE
MISSED TACKLE
TURNOVER WON
TURNOVERS CONCEDED
PENALTY CONCEDED
YELLOW CARD
POSSESSION
SCRUMS
LINEOUTS
The hinge came just after the hour. With the game still a one-score grind and Nohem Ez Zahouany in the bin at 60, Valentin Delpy did the grown-up thing twice — penalties on 65 and 70 — to turn 22-13 into 28-13. That 15-point cushion forced Clermont to chase from wider, riskier spots and handed Toulouse the only task they embraced all afternoon: fold, tackle, kick long, repeat. Delpy’s 13 points won’t make the highlights, but they won the game.
Underpinning all of it was Toulouse’s edge at the breakdown and set piece. Jack Willis set the tone with a relentless carrying shift and three turnovers, the kind of day that stalls opposition tempo before it begins. The scrum was clean (five from five) and the lineout supplied enough possession to live off scraps. Toulouse’s ruck speed was slower on average, but that said more about control than lethargy: they were happy to sit on the ball, exit on their terms and let Clermont do the chasing.
Clermont will argue the process was working. They did generate pace — faster average ruck ball, and Baptiste Jauneau pushed them through phase counts all afternoon. There was bite in the back three too: Timeo Frier beat defenders and finally scored on 78 minutes, proof of threat if not timing. And Barnabe Massa kept them in the contest with 18 tackles. But the nuts and bolts undid them. A 50% scrum and 50% lineout is a red-zone tax you can’t pay in Toulouse. Add 15 penalties and a yellow, and every period of pressure came with an asterisk.
If you want a snapshot of the different edges, look at the game’s bookends. Toulouse’s first looks produced points — Julien Marchand, Teddy Thomas and Simon Daroque had them 19-0 up inside 25 minutes. That wasn’t dominance across the park; it was a sharp edge when chances appeared. Clermont fought back through Jauneau just before the break and Harry Plummer off the tee to make it 19-10 at half, then 22-13 on 52 minutes. The chase was alive. And then Delpy’s boot walked them out of danger while Toulouse’s defence shut the door in the 22. Simple, ruthless, effective.
Does the margin flatter Toulouse? Not really. It reflects clinical habits and a pack that chose their moments. But there are notes to tidy: they ceded too much late territory and leaked penalties in the final quarter, and that slower ruck speed will look different against a side with sharper finishers. Still, after a blunt loss in Pau, this was the kind of pragmatic home win a league leader banks in an international window — with Delpy looking every inch a reliable game-manager while the stars are away.
For Clermont, this is a missed shot at a vulnerable week in Ernest-Wallon. They were the only side to win here last season because they were ruthless; here, they were anything but. The shape and tempo were good enough to earn nine entries. The set piece and decision-making inside the 22 were not. Clean the lineout, simplify the strike menu in the red zone, and keep Frier involved earlier, and the performance turns into points. Until then, they’ll keep leaving stadiums with the feeling they played most of the rugby and won none of the moments.
The takeaway is stark and familiar: Toulouse’s standard doesn’t drop when the jerseys change; the red-zone behaviours are ingrained. Clermont’s isn’t there yet. One team managed the game; the other managed phases. Only one of those puts numbers on the board.

